🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a shuttered park, public officials and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated controversy over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the federal government funds the cost of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent animals – something one caretaker observed directly.

She spent three years as a beluga trainer, a job that entailed earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She formed a particular love for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.

“Eve chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and navigate with fragments in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality veterinary services and around the clock supervision than any person in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park believed particulars of the death were disclosed to the media and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any efforts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In late September, Canada’s fisheries minister turned down a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a continued life in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As authorities attempt to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be highly debated. The future facility, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Others say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the location will mimic the mental engagement and nutrition the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|