🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.